Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42510299›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Psychiatric Assistance Dogs for Adults with Mental Health Conditions: Use, Perceived Effectiveness and Challenges.

Yuxuan Zhang, Amanda J Salmon, Nancy A Pachana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuxuan ZhangSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-2509-9024
Amanda J SalmonSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2043-0548
Nancy A PachanaSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8927-4205

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychiatric assistance dogs (PADs) are increasingly recognised as complementary supports for individuals with mental health conditions, yet their role in everyday functioning as well as handler and animal welfare remains underexplored. This study explored how PADs are used by individuals with a range of mental health conditions, the benefits they provide, and any challenges experienced in terms of both handler and animal well-being. An online mixed-methods survey was conducted, yielding 85 valid responses. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively; qualitative responses were examined using Leximancer. Findings suggest that PADs provide benefits beyond specific trained tasks, offering ongoing support that helps handlers feel safer and more able to engage in activities of daily living and mental health treatment. At the same time, participants reported challenges such as stigma, public misunderstanding of public access rights, and financial costs, which can limit the effectiveness of PAD support. Many participants also reported relying heavily on their PAD, which may have detrimental consequences for the well-being of both handler and animal. These findings highlight the importance of improving public awareness, access, and support systems to maximise the benefits of PADs and help ensure the well-being and safety of both PADs and their handlers. Future research should consider both human and animal perspectives in greater depth to better understand these partnerships.

Indexed as

animal-assisted interventionsemotional regulationmental healthpsychiatric assistance dogssafety regulation

Identifiers

PMID42510299
PMCPMC13404798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.