ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Action Feedback Enables Novices to Implicitly Acquire Task Regularities from Experts During Joint Statistical Learning.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Joint statistical learning enables interacting individuals to form shared representations, but prior research has primarily focused on homogeneous dyads with equivalent expertise. Real-world interactions often involve knowledge asymmetries, yet it remains unclear how novices implicitly acquire statistical regularities from expert partners via sensorimotor signals. This study investigated whether novices can implicitly extract sequence regularities to enhance joint statistical learning and compared two candidate mechanisms, action feedback versus action visibility. Using a modified serial reaction time task across three experiments, we found that novices paired with trained experts exhibited significantly steeper declines in reaction time compared to those paired with pseudo-experts. Moreover, expert-paired novices demonstrated a pronounced quadratic trajectory, indicating sequence-specific learning. Experiment 2 revealed that the absence of immediate action feedback eliminated this sequence-specific interference effect in novices, highlighting the critical role of shared perceptual outcomes in the implicit transmission of task regularities. Conversely, Experiment 3 showed that the absence of visual access to the expert's physical movements attenuated neither the novices' general sequence acquisition nor their sequence-specific interference effect. These findings extend the Theory of Event Coding framework to asymmetric social contexts by demonstrating that effect-based coding, rather than direct kinematic observation, drives implicit behavioral facilitation in joint action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.