Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42510261›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Deep Learning-Based Latent Trait Model for Forced-Choice Personality Assessment.

Xiaoyu Li, Jin Wu, Yupei Ren, Shaoyang Guo, Zhongquan Li, Chanjin Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaoyu LiSchool of Education and Intelligent Education Research Center, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0009-0000-5934-0374
Jin WuShanghai Institute of Artificial Intelligence for Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China.ORCID 0009-0001-7240-8238
Yupei RenShanghai Institute of Artificial Intelligence for Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China.
Shaoyang GuoSchool of Education and Intelligent Education Research Center, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2480-8800
Zhongquan LiDepartment of Psychology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8480-4166
Chanjin ZhengShanghai Institute of Artificial Intelligence for Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1232-0020

Funding

Yangzhou University 5005/137013769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of intelligent assessment, psychometric tests are becoming increasingly important for personnel selection, career development, and mental health assessment. Forced-choice tests are common in personality assessments because they require participants to select from closely related options, lowering the risk of response distortion. However, traditional latent trait models for forced-choice tests suffer from severe computational bottlenecks in high-dimensional settings. Furthermore, existing deep learning-based cognitive diagnosis models are primarily designed for independent items in educational scenarios (predicated on absolute scoring), making them structurally maladapted to the ipsative data (relative preference comparisons) generated by forced-choice tests. To address these challenges, this study presents a deep learning-based Forced-Choice Neural Latent Trait (FCNLT) Model that overcomes the limitations of traditional models and is applicable to the three most common item block types found in forced-choice tests. To account for the unidimensionality of items, participants' latent trait levels and item characteristics are represented as interpretable latent embeddings. FCNLT mines these features through nonlinear mapping and introduces a weighted BPR-based ranking loss to natively align with the relative-scoring nature of forced-choice data. Additionally, the monotonicity assumption is utilized to improve the interpretability of the trait estimates. The FCNLT's effectiveness is validated by experiments on real-world and simulated datasets that show its accuracy, interpretability, and robustness.

Indexed as

deep learningforced-choice testintelligent personality assessmentlatent trait model

Identifiers

PMID42510261
PMCPMC13405345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.