ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
How Do Similarity Cues Shape Children's Social Preference Inferences?
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People often prefer similar others. The present study examined children's use of three distinct similarity cues in their inferences about people's social preferences. Participants were 144 children aged 4-8 years (49% female; 74% White). In a between-subject design, children observed a target actor demonstrate similar movements (movement condition), show the same liking/disliking of two toys (liking condition), or speak the same non-native language (language condition) as one of two actors (the similar actor) but not the other dissimilar actor. Children were then asked who the target liked to play with between the two actors. The results showed that children chose the similar actor in the movement condition, regardless of whether they explicitly identified the similar actor, whereas in the liking condition, they did so only when they could correctly identify the similar actor. In the language condition, however, the target and the similar actor speaking the same non-native language had no detectable impact on children's answers. These findings are discussed in terms of how different types of similarity cues may shape children's understanding of others' social preferences, while also highlighting the need to consider differences in task demands and cue identifiability across conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.