ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Impact of Gratifications on Fake News Sharing Among Chinese Social Media Users and Its Mechanisms.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The literature pays little attention to the impact of gratifications on fake news sharing among Chinese social media users, and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) is rarely used in fake news research. This study investigated the relationship between gratifications and fake news sharing among Chinese users. Study 1 employed partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and fsQCA on the questionnaire data from 315 participants. Study 2 analyzed predictions of self-reported sharing intentions in task scenarios using data from 98 new participants. The PLS-SEM revealed that instant news sharing was positively predicted by time-passing, entertainment, and socializing gratifications; and negatively predicted by information seeking. Fake news sharing is positively predicted by instant news sharing and negatively predicted by fact-checking. The fsQCA revealed three distinct antecedent configurations leading to high sharing among users, demonstrating that sharing is driven by diverse, equifinal pathways rather than a single set of common characteristics. Study 2 confirmed that self-reported sharing intention predicts sharing intention in task scenarios. Gratifications influence users' fake news sharing through instant sharing and fact-checking, and three configurations prompt users to share fake news. These findings promote the cultural richness of the fake news-sharing research and offer practical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.