Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42509964›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Surgical Interventions for NEC-An Overview.

Tirion Hughes, Naomi Wright, Kokila Lakhoo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tirion HughesMedical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0009-0005-1810-7118
Naomi WrightOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Kokila LakhooNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Global Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Necrotising enterocolitis is a highly challenging condition in neonatal surgery, with a substantial proportion of affected infants requiring operative intervention with a significant associated morbidity and mortality. Radiological evidence of perforation represents a clear indication for surgery; however, in many other cases, the disease presentation and progression are heterogenous, with significant diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty. The surgical assessment and decision making in these cases relies on integrated judgement of the clinical trajectory, examination, and biochemical and radiological findings, as well as consideration of the comorbidities and gestational age. Although many have been proposed in the literature, there remains to be any universal validated thresholds or criteria for reliably identifying those infants who may be 'failing medical management' and are likely to develop intestinal necrosis. Similarly, comparisons of different surgical approaches (stoma, primary anastomosis, and damage-control strategies) and outcome reporting are often confounded by the disease severity index and patient selection, as well as the generally observational nature of studies within the field. Improved standardisation of disease and severity definitions, and the development of validated prognostic tools, will facilitate the earlier identification of infants most likely to benefit from surgery, which in turn could reduce delays to theatre and improve the outcomes. Multi-centre collaborative datasets provide important evidence in the path to achieving this aim, by providing valuable cohort and outcome data, which also contribute to informed shared decision making with parents and families.

Indexed as

necrotising enterocolitisneonatal intensive care unitneonatal laparotomyneonatal surgeryoutcome reportingpaediatric surgerypaediatric surgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID42509964
PMCPMC13407241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.