Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42509952›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Enhancing Early Integration of Pediatric Palliative Care: Evaluating a Clinician-Based Versus Criteria-Based Referral Process in Pediatric Oncology.

Alexis Fong-Leboeuf, Christina Vadeboncoeur, Donna L Johnston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexis Fong-LeboeufFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-3038-0513
Christina VadeboncoeurFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6589-4859
Donna L JohnstonFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesEarly palliative care referral for new oncologic diagnoses has been widely recognized as integral to comprehensive care, but there exists a paucity of research assessing referral patterns in pediatric oncology. The objective of this study is to review the change in referral patterns at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) before and after a set of referral criteria were implemented for routine consultation of pediatric palliative care (PPC) for all newly diagnosed oncology patients.

methodsThis was a retrospective single-centre chart review of all patients with a new oncologic diagnosis from 21 October 2017 to 1 January 2024 using information available in the patient's electronic medical record. Data was evaluated for referral patterns and the time from diagnosis to referral to PPC comparing the period before and after referral criteria were initiated (1 July 2019).

resultsA total of 504 chart reviews were completed and 226 patients were referred to PPC. The proportion of patients referred to PPC showed a statistically significant increase from 36.8% to 75.4% after introduction of PPC referral criteria (χ2(1) = 44.98,

conclusionsHaving referral criteria for consultation to PPC increased the proportion of oncology patients referred to PPC and resulted in a significant decrease in time to referral. These findings suggest that structured referral criteria support earlier integration of pediatric palliative care within oncology programmes.

Indexed as

early referralpediatric oncologypediatric palliative carequality improvementreferral criteria

Identifiers

PMID42509952
PMCPMC13406938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.