ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Perceptions of Proactive Palliative Care Integration Among Pediatric Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Providers: A Pilot Study.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) conveys significant risk of mortality, morbidity, impaired quality of life, and multifactorial distress. One potential strategy for improving experience and relieving suffering is proactive specialty palliative care (SPC) utilization. However, SPC is not routinely incorporated into pediatric HCT. One barrier to SPC integration is unknown pediatric HCT provider perceptions of SPC services, particularly among providers with lived experience working within a collaborative HCT-SPC partnership.
objectiveThis single-institution pilot study aimed to (1) describe an approach to standardized, proactive pediatric HCT-SPC clinical partnership, and (2) quantify acceptability, appropriateness, and satisfaction regarding the program among pediatric HCT providers.
methodsSurvey methods were used to assess attitudes among HCT providers who had worked with the SPC clinical partnership for at least three months. Core survey metrics were the validated Acceptability of Intervention Measure and Intervention Appropriateness Measure. Additional survey items were adapted from the Perceptions of Palliative Care Instrument.
resultsRespondents reported high mean scores for acceptability (4.96) and appropriateness (4.93) on a 5-point scale. Overall satisfaction with SPC integration averaged 8.72 (SD 1.13) on a 10-point scale. Satisfaction scores for each individual service provided by SPC were similarly high. No significant differences in responses were found based on provider type, prior SPC training, or years in practice.
conclusionsIn this single-institution pilot study, pediatric HCT providers with lived experience working in an environment with standardized SPC collaboration view SPC as highly acceptable, appropriate, and beneficial for their patients, supporting the feasibility and value of proactive SPC integration in pediatric HCT care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.