ArticleBiomolecules2026
Sequence-Anchored Shared Tumor-Specific Epitopes for Pre-Manufactured HLA-Matched mRNA Cancer Vaccine Libraries: A Pan-Cancer Framework.
Article in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A single vaccine cannot prevent or treat all cancers; however, recurrent tumor-specific epitopes may facilitate the development of pre-manufactured, HLA-matched mRNA vaccines tailored for specific molecular subgroups. We define the shared tumor-specific epitope as a recurring peptide derived from a viral oncoprotein, a driver mutation, a frameshift, an altered protein C-terminus, or a fusion junction, and we employ a rigorous cancer-cell-only criterion: a target must be recurrent within a defined subgroup, absent from essential normal tissues at the peptide-HLA level, naturally presented on tumor cells, and sufficiently clonal to minimize immune escape. Under this criterion, we present fifteen sequence-anchored reference designs alongside one conceptual placeholder across thirteen candidates divided into four superclasses: viral oncoproteins (such as HPV16/18 E6 and E7 as attenuated antigenic reference designs; Merkel cell polyomavirus serving as a design-specific placeholder), recurrent driver neoepitopes (including KRAS G12/G13, IDH1 R132H, and H3 K27M), hematologic neoantigens (such as NPM1 Type A C-terminus; and a single CALR exon 9 construct encoding the shared novel C-terminus of types 1 and 2 mutations), and fusion junctions (notably EWS-FLI1 and BCR-ABL). Each open reading frame is anchored to a canonical accession with its documented event; representative ORFs are provided as reference designs, with the intended residue-level verification records. These sequence designs are intended as reference constructs and are not suitable as clinical-grade or manufacturing-ready products; they require independent residue-level validation and comprehensive safety assessments prior to laboratory or clinical application. The historical record of non-personalized vaccination-including HPV and hepatitis B prophylaxis, intravesical BCG, and unsuccessful tumor-associated antigen trials-frames both the potential and limitations of such approaches. The practical product is not a universal vaccine but rather a governed library aligned with specific genotype, viral etiology, HLA context, and clinical setting. Currently, none of these designs have established proof-of-benefit-tier evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.