ArticleBiomolecules2026
Extracellular Particles Isolated from Leftover Discarded Formalin-Fixed Tissues Exhibit Atypical Extracellular RNA Profiles.
Article in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study reports atypical findings indicating that extracellular particles (EPs) isolated from leftover discarded formalin-fixed tissues (FFTs) contain atypical RNA profiles that may be highly fragmented. Using particle purification liquid chromatography (PPLC), we isolated EPs from five tissue types that had been immersed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, stored at room temperature, and collected at the point of discard. Tissues were de-identified and maintained at room temperature until EP separation and exRNA purification. Purified EPs were stored at -80 °C before physicochemical characterization and small RNA sequencing. PPLC separation profiles were broadly consistent with expected EP signatures, although subtle shifts in physicochemical properties were observed. exRNA was successfully recovered from all samples; however, RNA-Seq analysis showed that most reads were unclassified, while others mapped to microbial taxa rather than host-derived transcripts. These results suggest that EP-associated RNA in FFT may be substantially degraded and that microbial particles or nucleic acids were present in the tissues despite formalin fixation. Microbial viability was not assessed, as this was outside the scope of the study. Nonetheless, several explanations are plausible, including RNA fragmentation due to prolonged formalin exposure, microbial contamination during pre-discard storage, or inadequate or ineffective fixation that permitted microbial persistence or enrichment. Collectively, these findings indicate that leftover discarded tissues that were not flash-frozen or properly stored may be unsuitable-or at minimum require caution-when used as a source of EPs or EP-associated RNA. Investigators should consider RNA degradation/fragmentation, microbial confounders, and fixation-related artifacts when interpreting EP or exRNA data derived from FFT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.