ArticleChemical senses2026
Attentional modulation of contamination sensitivity: sharper perceptual boundaries for food compared to nonfood odor mixtures.
Article in Chemical senses, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Processing of contaminants in odor mixtures is influenced by their categorization into food and nonfood categories. For example, we previously found that participants were more likely to perceive food odors as contaminated by nonfood odors than vice versa, and that this effect was robust to changes in explicit task instructions. However, due to the mixing of food and nonfood components, processing differences between categories were not captured by this task design and thus remain to be explored. In the current pre-registered study, we address this knowledge gap by determining the effects of attention on the perception of odor mixtures containing only food or nonfood components. Participants (N = 24) assessed the perceived dominance of a target odor within an odor mixture. Response times to all odors increased toward the dilution series' midpoint and were faster for food odor compared to nonfood odor mixtures. Perceived target dominance increased linearly for nonfood targets but exhibited a sigmoidal shape with a steeper slope (smaller just-noticeable difference) for food targets. This implies that distinguishing 2 food odors was easier than distinguishing between 2 nonfood odors, likely due to definitions higher relevance of distinct object category boundaries subserving contamination avoidance. At the same time, contamination sensitivity might be lower for nonfoods, allowing for greater tolerance of deviations. Attention did not influence the perception of nonfood but did so for ambivalent food mixtures and when the target was completely absent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.