ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2026
Efficacy, Safety, and Maintenance Use of Topical Bexarotene in Early-Stage Mycosis Fungoides: A Single-Center Retrospective Real-World Study.
Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Topical bexarotene 1% gel is an approved skin-directed treatment for refractory or persistent stage IA-IB cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, but real-world evidence in mycosis fungoides (MF), particularly regarding maintenance use after complete response, remains limited. We retrospectively reviewed 56 patients with histopathologically and immunohistochemically confirmed, previously treated stage IA-IB MF who received topical bexarotene between 2009 and 2022. Clinical response, post-treatment biopsy findings, adverse events, maintenance therapy, and relapse outcomes were analyzed. The cohort included 31 women and 25 men; 42 patients (75.0%) had stage IA and 14 (25.0%) had stage IB disease. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 20 patients (35.7%) and partial response in 15 (26.8%), yielding an overall response rate of 62.5%. Overall response was higher in stage IA than in stage IB disease (73.8% vs. 28.6%; p = 0.003) and in T1a than in T2a disease (77.1% vs. 36.4%; p = 0.044). All biopsied complete responders showed no MF-compatible histology. Adverse events were exclusively local and manageable. Among 18 evaluable complete responders, relapse occurred in 15 (83.3%). Median time to relapse was longer with maintenance topical bexarotene than without maintenance (45 vs. 30 weeks; p = 0.039). Topical bexarotene appears effective and well tolerated in previously treated stage IA-IB MF, with greatest benefit in limited patch-stage disease. Maintenance use after CR may delay relapse, but this exploratory finding requires prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.