ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Equivalent outcomes after elective inguinal hernia repair for patients living near and far from care.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDistance to care has been associated with worse clinical outcomes. Whether this is true for patients traveling to centers of excellence for elective inguinal hernia repair is unclear.
methodsPatients undergoing elective, first-time, clean, unilateral inguinal hernia repair with permanent synthetic mesh from 2016 to 2023 within the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative registry were identified. Patients were stratified by the distance between their home and surgical site, with cohorts of less than 5, 5-10, 10-20, 20-30, 30-60, and greater than 60 miles. Association between distance and clinical outcomes (readmission, infection, reoperation, recurrence, and quality of life) were evaluated, with follow-up data available for all patients at 30 days and for some up to 5 years.
resultsA total of 14,206 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients living further tended to be older (p < 0.001), less racially diverse (p < 0.001), and covered by Medicare and Medicaid rather than private insurance (p < 0.001). Most comorbidities did not differ except for liver failure (p < 0.001), ascites (p < 0.001), anticoagulation (p < 0.001), immunosuppression (p < 0.001), and higher ASA class (p < 0.001), all associated with more distant cohorts. Hernia size did not differ. Patients farther from care were more likely to undergo open rather than minimally invasive repair with 37% open for patients > 60 miles vs. 33% open for < 5 miles (p < 0.001). Clinical outcomes including readmission, infection, reoperation, and recurrence (up to 5 years) were comparable regardless of distance traveled. Quality of life improvements were greatest at 6 months post-operatively in patients living 30-60 miles from care.
conclusionsDistance to care is not associated with increased surgical site infections or recurrence after elective inguinal hernia repair. Further study of rurality and social determinants of health in hernia care is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42509502What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.