ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2026
Species-Specific Recognition in Fig-Wasp Mutualism: The Role of Volatile Blends and Seasonal Shifts in Olfactory Responses.
Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) mediate host recognition in the obligate fig-fig wasp mutualism, but studies on the chemical mechanisms maintaining pollinator host specificity in sympatric, phylogenetically distant fig species remain scarce. We investigated two sympatric dioecious fig species from different subgenera: Ficus hispida (pollinated by Ceratosolen solmsi marchali), and Ficus hirta (pollinated by Valisia javana), integrating behavioral assays, GC-MS, and GC-EAD to distinguish physiological perception from behavioral outcome. Both fig wasp species were attracted to host VOCs but showed species-specific responses to non-host odors: V. javana actively avoided non-host volatiles, whereas C. solmsi marchali showed no preference. GC-MS identified 44 compounds in F. hispida and 47 in F. hirta, with significant interspecific divergence (PERMANOVA, p = 0.001) but minimal seasonal variation within F. hispida. GC-EAD revealed that C. solmsi marchali perceived 15 host compounds in spring and 12 in summer; V. javana perceived 8 in spring and 5 in summer. Both species consistently perceived Linalool and 1,8-Cineole, but these ubiquitous plant volatiles alone cannot explain host specificity. Instead, specificity is likely conferred by the specific ratios in which common compounds and host-unique volatiles are combined-for example Indole and (E, E)-Cosmene in F. hispida, and α-Cedrene epoxide in F. hirta. By distinguishing perception from behavior, we show that host fidelity is maintained through species-specific VOC blends, with seasonal modulation of olfactory sensitivity further shaping pollinator responses. These findings contribute to understanding chemical communication evolution under sympatry and seasonal environmental variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42509476What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.