ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Who is at Risk of Residual Tumor and Pathologic Upstaging at a Second TURBT in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer?
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhanced CT-based deep learning radiomics for bladder cancer prognosis.Military Medical Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to determine the rates and predictors of residual tumor and pathologic upstaging among patients undergoing a second transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT).
methodsThis retrospective study investigated patients who underwent a second TURBT within 2-6 weeks after an initial complete TURBT for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. A second TURBT was performed in cases of T1 tumors, high-grade Ta tumors, and absence of the detrusor muscle in the initial specimen. Patients were initially categorized by the presence of residual tumor, and those with residual disease were further stratified according to their pathologic upstaging status. Potential predictors, including patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical team consistency, and complications, were analyzed using logistic regression.
resultsAmong 728 patients who underwent TURBT, 284 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Residual tumor was detected in 144 patients (50.7%). Multivariable analysis showed that multifocality, tumor size ≥ 3 cm, resection from both the primary and additional sites, complications, and female sex were independently associated with residual tumor (all p < 0.05). Pathologic upstaging was observed in 20 (13.9%) of the 144 patients with residual tumor. Primary tumor morphology was the only independent predictor of pathologic upstaging, with solid (odds ratio [OR], 7.72; p = 0.013) and papillosolid (OR, 4.07; p = 0.020) morphologies associated with a higher risk than papillary morphology.
conclusionA second TURBT remains an important reassessment step for residual tumor and upstaging. Risk assessment for patients undergoing a second TURBT should incorporate initial pathology, tumor burden, endoscopic appearance, and tumor morphology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42509410What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.