ArticleScientific reports2026
Explainable deep learning for early sepsis detection from ICU time-series data using XAI techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis is one of the most deadly illnesses with a high risk of mortality. Consequently, identifying it at the beginning of illness symptoms is crucial and plays a key role in improving patient outcomes. This study presents a customized solution for the early detection of sepsis with an emphasis on the use of interpretability and explainability techniques, utilizing a range of machine learning approaches and interpretable artificial intelligence methods. The database on which this research study is based has many problems; the main ones being large data gaps and class disparities. Employing robust methods, precise categorizations, and rigorous computations, Approximately 12 diverse models were developed and optimized. With ROC-AUC indicators of 0.9566 and 0.9595 and F1 scores of 0.85 and 0.85 respectively, Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) and Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) models performed better than conventional models in terms of sepsis prediction. These two approaches have shown remarkable progress in detecting clinical patterns while avoiding false negative results-an essential aspect of the medical field. To assess model performance and offer clear insights into model predictions, interpretation-based techniques were employed. This improved clinical confidence and facilitated well-informed decisions in crucial medical diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.