ArticleJournal of anesthesia2026
Anatomical variations of the external obturator muscle and their impact on injectate spread to the obturator canal: a cadaveric study related to ultrasound-guided proximal obturator nerve block.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We anatomically investigated whether the superior fasciculus (SF) of the external obturator muscle (EOM) influences the spread of dye into the obturator canal, in a cadaveric model simulating a proximal ultrasound-guided obturator nerve block. Thirteen sides from seven Thiel-embalmed cadavers (five male cadavers, nine sides; two female cadavers, four sides) were studied. Blue dye was injected either between the pectineus muscle and the EOM, the pectineus muscle and the SF, or the SF and the main belly of the EOM. After injection, gross dissection was performed to evaluate dye spread along the obturator nerve and into the obturator canal. In the SF-absent sides (four of thirteen), the dye injected between the pectineus muscle and the EOM broadly stained both the anterior and posterior branches and spread into the obturator canal, with staining of the obturator nerve trunk in all cases. In the SF-present sides (nine of thirteen), dye injection between the pectineus muscle and the SF (five sides) failed to produce canal spread, and neither the posterior branch nor the trunk was stained. In contrast, dye injection between the SF and the main belly of the EOM (four sides) stained both branches in all cases and achieved canal spread with obturator nerve trunk staining on three sides. Because the SF may restrict obturator-canal spread during the proximal approach, the injection site may need to be adjusted according to the presence of the SF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42509351What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.