ArticleMycorrhiza2026
Is aerial dispersal an overlooked pathway for ectomycorrhizal truffle fungi?
Article in Mycorrhiza, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dispersal of ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi is typically characterized by an ecological dichotomy in which aboveground (epigeous) mushrooms disperse via wind and belowground (hypogeous) truffles disperse via animal-mediated movement. To assess whether hypogeous EM fungi may be dispersed by wind more often than generally recognized, we used high-throughput sequencing of paired spore trap and soil samples at eight sites across the United States. Within the spore trap samples, hypogeous EM taxa represented 17.2 ± 1.62% (mean ± SE) of the total EM OTUs and 19.4 ± 1.75% of the total EM sequence reads. In general, their presence was characterized by episodic higher abundance events rather than continuous occupancy as compared to epigeous EM taxa. The hypogeous EM taxa found in spore traps also had significantly smaller average spore volumes than those remaining in the soil, likely facilitating their presence in air. Further, by identifying multiple instances of the same hypogeous EM OTU being present in spore trap and soil samples located tens of km apart, our study suggests wind may carry spores of hypogeous EM fungi considerable distances. Collectively, these findings indicate that the boundary between dispersal pathways for hypogeous EM fungi may be more fluid than previously thought and that specific traits and vectors allow them to exploit the atmosphere as a complementary dispersal pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.