Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
High versus standard dose caffeine in prevention of apnea of prematurity: an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial (HI-CAF trial).
Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-dose caffeine may improve respiratory outcomes in preterm neonates, but evidence remains uncertain in the era of routine early caffeine use and non-invasive ventilation. We compared high-dose (HDC) versus standard-dose caffeine (SDC) in preterm neonates at risk of or having apnea of prematurity. This single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial enrolled preterm neonates born at < 32 weeks' gestation. Neonates were randomized to receive either HDC (loading dose 40 mg/kg, maintenance 10 mg/kg/day) or SDC (loading dose 20 mg/kg, maintenance 5 mg/kg/day). The primary outcome was the need for escalation to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) for apnea. Secondary outcomes included duration of respiratory support before successful weaning, extubation failure, duration and utilization of respiratory support, feeding outcomes, adverse effects, neonatal morbidities and mortality. A total of 140 neonates were randomized, with 70 assigned to each group. Baseline maternal and neonatal characteristics were comparable. Requiring escalation to NIPPV for apnea in HDC was 30 (42.9%), and in SDC, 38 (54.3%) (RR 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56, 1.11; p = 0.176). The median (IQR) duration of respiratory support before successful weaning was 11.5 (5.0-25.0) days in the HDC and 8.5 (5.0-17.3) days in the SDC group (median difference 1 day; 95% CI - 2.0, 5.0; p = 0.385). Competing-risk analysis accounting for death before successful weaning showed no difference between groups (sub-distribution hazard ratio: 0.89; 95% CI 0.61, 1.30; p = 0.570). Extubation failure, respiratory support utilization, neonatal morbidities, adverse effects, and mortality were similar between groups.
conclusionAmong preterm neonates born at < 32 weeks' gestation, high-dose caffeine did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in escalation to NIPPV for apnea. Adequately powered multicentre trials are required to evaluate the additional benefit of HDC alongside the use of NIPPV.
trial registrationCTRI/2024/03/063926. Registration date: 11/03/2024. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Caffeine, at standard pharmacological doses, facilitates extubation in preterm infants and reduces the rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. • Previous studies have suggested that higher caffeine doses may reduce extubation failure and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. WHAT IS KNOWN: • In preterm neonates born at < 32 weeks' gestation, high-dose caffeine did not significantly reduce the need for escalation to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for apnea compared with standard-dose caffeine. • High-dose caffeine did not improve duration of respiratory support, extubation failure, neonatal morbidities, or mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42509341What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.