ArticleScientific reports2026
A deep reinforcement learning account of competition and integration of visual and goal vector signals for spatial navigation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integrating different sources of information is essential to successful spatial navigation. For instance, animals often rely on a combination of visual impressions, self-motion, olfaction, and other signals to navigate towards a goal. This is especially important when navigating in uncertain environments, where switching from one source of information to another or integrating multiple sources of information may be required to make navigation decisions. We propose a deep reinforcement learning model of the interaction of visual and goal-vector signals based on reinforcement learning and use it to study behavior and spatial representations. We show that the nature and degree of signal noise strongly influences how the signals drive behavior and spatial representations. Our model also demonstrates that the ability to navigate using each information source independently, in addition to integrating them, is crucial to successfully navigating in uncertain environments. Counterintuitively, our model shows that when one of the signals is removed, navigation may be improved if the remaining signal is reliable and sufficient to navigate. However, this improvement comes at the expense of robustness. Our modeling results demonstrate that combining redundant sources of information in biological systems is far more complex than suggested by sensor fusion in the engineering context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.