ArticleScientific reports2026
The impact of climate and vegetation on the riverside architecture of the Brazilian Amazon.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research aimed to investigate the impact of vegetation conservation on the local climate and architectural production of two riverside communities in one of the capitals of the Brazilian Amazon, one close to and the other far from the urban area. Based on the inductive-exploratory method, we collected primary climatological data in the external area and inside the dwellings in both communities (October 2022 to May 2023), developed analyses of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Land Surface Temperature (LST) (August 2022 to May 2023), and finally collected architectural information from the dwellings investigated. Our results show that the climatological data from the two communities are statistically different, being more favorable to comfort in the community with greater vegetation conservation. Analysis of remote sensing images showed that vegetation density in this community indicates a strong relationship with vegetative regeneration capacity after the most critical dry months of the period investigated. Regarding thermal comfort inside dwellings, the data showed that, both through statistical analysis and the thermal comfort model adopted, the combined effect of building materials, vegetation cover, and environmental context favors better thermal comfort conditions. The results presented point to the importance of vegetation conservation, which positively influenced the local climate and thermal comfort of riverside dwellings. In addition, our results encourage the perpetuation of traditional knowledge that adapts architecture to the forest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.