Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42509252›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2026

Improved inter-lab precision after CML international scale adoption: a 15-year history of BCR::ABL1 proficiency testing.

Annette S Kim, Thomas Long, Derek A Oldridge, Lawrence J Jennings, Yi Ding, Patricia Vasalos, Christopher Watt, Richard D Press

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Annette S KimDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. kimannet@med.umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8699-2439
Thomas LongBiostatistics Department, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL, USA.
Derek A OldridgePathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lawrence J JenningsDepartment of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8669-7774
Yi DingDepartment of Pathology, Geisinger Health, Danville, PA, USA.
Patricia VasalosProficiency Testing, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL, USA.
Christopher WattDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Richard D PressDepartment of Pathology and Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2103-5144

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise inter-laboratory quantitation of BCR::ABL1 RNA is critical for effective chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) disease management. Although standardized reporting on the International Scale (IS) was specifically developed to improve inter-laboratory reproducibility in BCR::ABL1 quantitation, the clinical impact of this reporting system has not been comprehensively assessed. We analyzed 15 years of BCR::ABL1 results (2009-2023) reported by over 200 clinical laboratories (6 annual samples; >5500 results) in a College of American Pathologists proficiency testing program. Inter-laboratory precision was evaluated by standard deviations (SD) for high, intermediate, and low-transcript samples. Early rapid IS adoption over 7 years (8% of labs in 2009; 86% by 2015) was correlated with a progressive decrease in inter-lab SDs of reported BCR::ABL1 results (high-sample r = -0.73, p = 0.004; intermediate-sample r = -0.71, p = 0.022; low-sample r = -0.84, p = 0.002). IS implementation exceeded 99% by 2019, as inter-lab SD's reached their nadir value (~0.2). No other assessed variable correlated with time-dependent improvement in inter-lab reproducibility, including reference gene selection (ABL1 versus others), RQ-PCR reagent selection, assay type (FDA-approved, commercial, or laboratory-developed), or practice setting. IS-based reporting is thus likely the principal driver of enhanced inter-laboratory precision in BCR::ABL1 quantitation, validating the real-world clinical relevance of adopting robust standardization in clinical molecular diagnostics.

Indexed as

Fusion Proteins, bcr-ablLaboratories, ClinicalLaboratory Proficiency TestingLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveHumansReproducibility of ResultsBCR-ABL1 fusion protein, humanFusion Proteins, bcr-abl

Identifiers

PMID42509252
PMCPMC13612228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.