ArticleAnatomy & cell biology2026
Population-specific reference values for calcaneal angular parameters and their limited utility in sex estimation.
Article in Anatomy & cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The calcaneus is the largest tarsal bone located in the lower part of the ankle joint and plays a significant role in walking, running, and maintaining balance. Certain angles of this bone, which is of great clinical and anthropological importance, are used in the diagnosis and treatment of fractures. The aim of this study is to determine the mean values of angular parameters of the calcaneus in a healthy population and to evaluate the accuracy rates of these parameters in predicting sex. In this study, six bilateral angle measurements were performed on radiographs from 540 individuals aged 20-65. Measured angles included Böhler, Gissane, calcaneal inclination, Fowler-Philip, lateral talocalcaneal, and calcaneal compression. The obtained data were compared between sexes, age groups, and right-left sides. Additionally, a receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for sex prediction. Statistical analyses revealed significant differences between right and left sides in the calcaneal inclination angle and lateral talocalcaneal angle, between sexes in the calcaneal compression angle, and between age groups in the Böhler and Gissane angles. Analyses performed for sex prediction showed that the angles were not suitable for this purpose. The findings and the determination of the mean values of the angles provide useful information for decision-making in clinical diagnosis and treatment processes. It was found that using only calcaneal angles is not appropriate for sex prediction in the Turkish population. The findings may contribute to the establishment of population-specific reference values and provide baseline data for future multivariate or machine learning-based investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.