ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026
Building Trust in a Newly Established Physician-Patient Relationship: A Scoping Review.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrust is a fundamental component of the physician-patient relationship, influencing cooperation, adherence, and patient outcomes. While much research has focused on long-term relationships, little is known about the factors that shape trust during the very first physician-patient encounter.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the factors contributing to the development of patients' trust in a newly established physician-patient relationship. SEARCH STRATEGY: We conducted a scoping review and applied thematic analysis to synthesise findings from identified studies. PubMed database was searched using predefined keywords for articles published between January 1975 and January 2026. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Initially, 2825 studies were identified, with 2818 remaining after duplicates were removed. Studies underwent title and abstract screening, with 142 shortlisted based on inclusion criteria. Studies were eligible if they focused on the first physician-patient encounter and trust was either the primary evaluated variable or one of the evaluated variables. Full-text assessments reduced this to 10 studies for thematic analysis.
resultsFactors positively associated with trust building were organised according to the phase in which they appeared to influence trust: pre-consultation, during consultation, and post-consultation. In the pre-consultation phase, physician reputation, care coordination, and previous positive experiences appeared to support trust. During consultation, a warm approach, perceived technical skills, information sharing, patient participation, active listening, and empathy enhanced trust. Post-consultation, trust was reinforced by symptom relief and recovery. An apology for medical errors was crucial as well. Conversely, limited opportunities to ask questions, time constraints, unmet expectations, stigmatisation, and inappropriate language appeared to be negatively associated with trust. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsThe findings suggest that trust building begins before the initial encounter, continues throughout the consultation itself, and may be reinforced by experiences following the visit. Trust between physicians and new patients appears to be shaped by both technical competence and communication skills. Medical education should therefore encompass both domains to support high-quality care and effective clinical relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.