SynthesisAnnals of family medicine2026
The Paradoxes of Social Care: Reframing Apparent Conflicts.
Synthesis in Annals of family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSocial care-health care that aims to understand and address patients' social needs-is increasingly recognized as a strategy for reducing disparities. However, social care literature is characterized by numerous conflicts. Paradox, the coexistence of seemingly contradictory yet simultaneously true positions, can serve as a useful lens for examining these tensions. This study aimed to identify key paradoxes in the social care literature to illuminate the resources, mindset, and approaches required for effective social care.
methodsA sub-analysis was conducted of a systematic review on facilitators and barriers to social care in adult primary care. Investigators reviewed articles iteratively to identify apparent contradictions. Findings were grouped in paradox themes, and approaches for reconciliation were explored.
resultsOf 153 full-text studies in the systematic review, 82 addressed potential paradoxes. We identified 12 recurring paradoxes and 3 overarching reconciliation strategies: de-emphasizing the ideal in favor of meaningful action, tailoring implementation approaches, and contextualizing to localized contexts.
conclusionsThis review identifies 12 paradoxes representing conflicting social care stances. Framing these conflicts as paradoxes enables more nuanced strategies for advancing research, practice, and policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.