SynthesisEarly intervention in psychiatry2026
Assessing the Effectiveness, Adherence and Attrition of Smartphone-Based Mental Health Interventions in University Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMental health challenges are prevalent among university students, many of whom face barriers to accessing traditional psychological services. Smartphone-delivered mental health applications offer a scalable intervention option, but evidence regarding their effectiveness and engagement remains limited. This systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis examined clinical and engagement outcomes of app-based mental health interventions in university students.
methodMedline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global and Scopus were searched from inception to 27 October 2025 (initial search: 2 April 2025). Randomised controlled trials were synthesised using multilevel meta-analysis and non-randomised designs were narratively synthesised. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Outcomes included depression, anxiety, stress, well-being, disordered eating and body image, alongside attrition and adherence.
resultsA total of k = 122 studies were included. Interventions produced significant effects across all outcomes: anxiety (d = 0.22, 95% CI [0.14, 0.30]), depression (d = 0.25, 95% CI [0.16, 0.33]), stress (d = 0.28, 95% CI [0.19, 0.38]), well-being (d = 0.47, 95% CI [0.16, 0.78]), disordered eating (d = 0.29, 95% CI [0.06, 0.52]) and body image (d = 0.27, 95% CI [0.06, 0.48]). Substantial heterogeneity was observed for most outcomes. Attrition was moderate (17.0%, 95% CI [13.5, 21.2]) and adherence varied (70.0%, 95% CI [54.0, 82.0]). Personalization significantly moderated depression outcomes.
conclusionsApp-based interventions demonstrate small-to-moderate benefits for university student mental health, though heterogeneity and engagement challenges limit impact. Future research should prioritise personalised, transdiagnostic approaches and standardised engagement reporting, with greater focus on eating- and appearance-related outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.