ArticleBMJ open2026
Dynamic prediction of cardiovascular risk from linked primary care records in New South Wales, Australia: protocol for a retrospective prognostic modelling study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality. Most existing CVD prediction tools use a baseline survival modelling framework, in which each predictor is represented by a single value recorded at the start of follow-up. Although risk calculators can be re-run using updated values, these models do not explicitly use the longitudinal, irregularly recorded information in primary-care electronic medical records (EMRs). Dynamic modelling approaches have the potential to generate updated CVD risk estimates at each general practitioner (GP) encounter, supporting both risk assessment and monitoring of changes over time. This protocol outlines the development and validation of transformer-based sequence models for encounter-level prediction of 5-year CVD risk, compared with dynamic landmark survival models and benchmarked against static CVD prediction tools. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study will use the New South Wales (NSW) Lumos linked health data asset, a large, privacy-preserving linkage of GP EMRs with hospital admissions, mortality and other administrative datasets across NSW, Australia. Eligible GP encounters will be included from 2018 onwards. The primary outcome is first fatal or non-fatal CVD event within 5 years of each eligible encounter, identified using ICD-10-AM codes in linked hospital and mortality data. Predictor variables include routinely collected demographics, chronic conditions, clinical measurements and medications, as well as healthcare utilisation patterns available at or before each encounter. Sex-specific dynamic landmark survival models (such as Cox proportional hazards models) with time-updated covariates (full and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)-regularised) will be developed alongside sex-specific transformer-based sequence models, fine-tuned for 5-year risk prediction at each encounter. Internal validation will use repeated resampling for landmark survival models with patient-level and temporal separation for sequence models. Geographic transportability will be evaluated using internal-external validation across primary health networks (PHNs). Performance will be evaluated using discrimination, calibration, decision-curve analysis and subgroup analyses and will be compared with existing static predictive models. Missing-data will be imputed where necessary: a range of imputation approaches will be compared to optimise computational efficiency but also support predictive generalisability. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is conducted under NSW Health governance arrangements with approval from the NSW Population and Health Services Research Ethics Committee (2019/ETH00660). Analyses will be performed within a secure data environment using de-identified linked data. Results will be reported in accordance with TRIPOD-AI guidance and disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conferences and policy and consumer forums.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.