Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42509009›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2026

Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance enterography and intestinal ultrasound for treatment response assessment in Crohn's disease (MANTRA): protocol for a multicentre, non-randomised, multiple-arm, prospective cohort comparison study.

Maira Hameed, Busola Adebusoye, Sue Mallett, Katerina Soteriou, Isabelle De Kock, Hameed Rafiee, Steve Halligan, Stuart A Taylor, MANTRA Study Collaborators

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06800326 (Diagnostic Concordance of MR Enterography and Ultrasound for Treatment Response Assessment in Crohn's Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06800326 recruitingnot on this map

Diagnostic Concordance of MR Enterography and Ultrasound for Treatment Response Assessment in Crohn's Disease (MANTRA): a Multicentre, Non-randomised, Multiple-arm, Prospective Cohort Comparison Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2024 to 2026Enrolled155ConditionsCrohn DiseaseArmsUltrasound, MRE Scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maira HameedUniversity College London Centre for Medical Imaging, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6290-5695
Busola AdebusoyeUniversity College London Centre for Medical Imaging, London, UK.
Sue MallettUniversity College London Centre for Medical Imaging, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0596-8200
Katerina SoteriouUniversity College London Hospital Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Isabelle De KockGhent University Hospital Radiology Department, Ghent, Flanders, Belgium.
Hameed RafieeNorfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, England, UK.
Steve HalliganUniversity College London Centre for Medical Imaging, London, UK.
Stuart A TaylorUniversity College London Centre for Medical Imaging, London, UK stuart.taylor@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6765-8806
MANTRA Study Collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMR enterography (MRE) and intestinal ultrasound (IUS) are used to assess therapeutic response in Crohn's disease (CD) follow-up. There is, however, no clear guidance regarding which modality should be used for individual patients or if they are interchangeable. Therefore, clinical practice varies. We will compare the accuracy of MRE and IUS to classify treatment response in CD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Multicentre, non-randomised, multiple arm, prospective cohort study of luminal CD patients aged 16 years or older being treated with steroids, immunomodulators, biologics/biosimilars or small molecules with baseline MRE or IUS. The study will be based in three tertiary referral centres, UK (n=2) and Belgium (n=1), with a target sample size of 155 patients. Patients will undergo both MRE and IUS for response assessment within 20 months of baseline scanning, performed within 6 weeks of each other. One scan will be standard care, the other a research intervention. Interpreting radiologists will be masked to the alternative response assessment test. The primary outcome is the comparative accuracy of MRE and IUS for European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation-European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology treatment response group categorisation compared with multidisciplinary consensus panel reference standard, using all available clinical information. Secondary outcomes include the influence of baseline scanning (MRE or IUS) on response characterisation accuracy, response accuracy of MRE and IUS disease activity scoring systems, management impact for each follow-up imaging modality and patient reported preferences. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by the National Health Service Research Ethics Committee and West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee 1 (24/WS/0121). Participant informed written consent will be obtained. Findings will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and patient and public involvement collaborators. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06800326.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseIntestinesMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultBelgiumFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeUltrasonographyUnited KingdomYoung AdultInflammatory bowel diseaseMagnetic Resonance ImagingPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresTreatment OutcomeUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID42509009
PMCPMC13409083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.