Observational studyBMJ open2026
Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance enterography and intestinal ultrasound for treatment response assessment in Crohn's disease (MANTRA): protocol for a multicentre, non-randomised, multiple-arm, prospective cohort comparison study.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06800326 (Diagnostic Concordance of MR Enterography and Ultrasound for Treatment Response Assessment in Crohn's Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnostic Concordance of MR Enterography and Ultrasound for Treatment Response Assessment in Crohn's Disease (MANTRA): a Multicentre, Non-randomised, Multiple-arm, Prospective Cohort Comparison Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMR enterography (MRE) and intestinal ultrasound (IUS) are used to assess therapeutic response in Crohn's disease (CD) follow-up. There is, however, no clear guidance regarding which modality should be used for individual patients or if they are interchangeable. Therefore, clinical practice varies. We will compare the accuracy of MRE and IUS to classify treatment response in CD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Multicentre, non-randomised, multiple arm, prospective cohort study of luminal CD patients aged 16 years or older being treated with steroids, immunomodulators, biologics/biosimilars or small molecules with baseline MRE or IUS. The study will be based in three tertiary referral centres, UK (n=2) and Belgium (n=1), with a target sample size of 155 patients. Patients will undergo both MRE and IUS for response assessment within 20 months of baseline scanning, performed within 6 weeks of each other. One scan will be standard care, the other a research intervention. Interpreting radiologists will be masked to the alternative response assessment test. The primary outcome is the comparative accuracy of MRE and IUS for European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation-European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology treatment response group categorisation compared with multidisciplinary consensus panel reference standard, using all available clinical information. Secondary outcomes include the influence of baseline scanning (MRE or IUS) on response characterisation accuracy, response accuracy of MRE and IUS disease activity scoring systems, management impact for each follow-up imaging modality and patient reported preferences. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by the National Health Service Research Ethics Committee and West of Scotland Research Ethics Committee 1 (24/WS/0121). Participant informed written consent will be obtained. Findings will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and patient and public involvement collaborators. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06800326.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.