ArticleBMJ open2026
Determinants influencing triage system at tertiary care centre as perceived by triage nurse: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe objective of this study is to explore the lived experiences of triage nurses. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary and secondary outcomes are the identification of barriers and facilitators that influence effective triage practice in a tertiary care centre in a low- and middle-income country.
designA qualitative phenomenological study was conducted, grounded in a realistic ontology, which assumes that reality is subjective and constructed through individual experiences. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nursing staff until data saturation was achieved. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, translated and analysed using Colaizzi's phenomenological analysis method. Member checking ensured credibility.
settingThe study was conducted in the triage unit of the emergency department at Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Nepal, where approximately 40 000 patients are served annually.
participantsIn-depth interview was conducted among the staff working in the triage unit. The study required nine in-depth interviews to attain saturation.
resultsStaff demonstrated a thorough understanding of the triage system and severity-based prioritisation tool used in triage. Training, protocols, teamwork and experience facilitated effective practice; however, resource limitations, overcrowding, staffing shortages, training gaps, communication challenges and social hierarchy adversely affected triage efficiency.
conclusionsTriage is practised with conceptual understanding; however, performance is constrained by resource limitations, workforce insufficiencies, administrative and sociocultural challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.