ArticleBMJ open2026
Comparison of ultrasound-guided intertransverse process block versus paravertebral block for postoperative quality of recovery in elderly patients undergoing minimally invasive thoracic surgery: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThoracic paravertebral block (PVB) is widely used for analgesia but carries risks such as pneumothorax and hypotension. Intertransverse process block (ITPB) is a newer alternative that may offer comparable analgesia with a potentially improved safety profile. However, few studies have compared the two from the patient's perspective, and none have assessed ultrasound-guided ITPB against PVB for postoperative recovery quality in elderly patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This two-centre, double-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial will enrol 152 elderly patients (age ≥65 years) undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) at West China Hospital and Shangjin Branch of West China Hospital, Sichuan University in China. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ultrasound-guided ITPB (n=76) or PVB (n=76). The primary outcome is the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score on postoperative day 1. Secondary outcomes will include (1) QoR-15 scores measured on postoperative days 2, 3, 7 and 30; (2) pain scores at rest and during movement assessed on postoperative days 1, 2 and 3 using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS); (3) worst NRS resting pain score within 30 min of post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) admission; (4) proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesia within 24 hours after surgery; (5) patient satisfaction with analgesia within 24 hours after surgery; (6) total opioid consumption within 24 hours after surgery; (7) incidence of major complications of surgery within 7 days after surgery; (8) length of postoperative hospital stay; and (9) number of days at home within 30 days after surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has received approval from the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (approval no. 2603), and the Ethics Committee of Shangjin Branch of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (approval no. 2613). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Study results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2600116524.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.