ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2026
Qualitative insights into patient and carer perspectives of malignant pleural effusion management: an embedded study within the TACTIC trial.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a condition characterised by excessive fluid build-up in the pleural cavity caused by cancer. Management options focus on drainage of fluid from the pleural cavity with a common aim of minimising symptoms and improving quality of life. Definitive pleural intervention is recommended for most patients with MPE to achieve longer-term symptom control. A patient-centred approach is also emphasised. However, little is known about the patient and carer experiences of MPE management. Therefore, this study sought to examine patient and carer experiences of differing procedural interventions within a trial setting.
methodsPatients with MPE and their carers who were taking part in the TACTIC trial in hospitals across the UK were invited to take part in a one-off interview. Thirty-two participants were recruited, and 22 semistructured interviews were conducted. Interview formats were either patient only, carer only or patient and carer dyad interviews. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a generalised thematic analysis approach.
resultsInitial findings demonstrated that patients and carers were generally satisfied with the MPE management and care received. No significant differences in acceptability were found between the two management strategies. Further analysis led to the development of four overarching themes: experiences of MPE beyond the trial, experiences of pain, preferences in MPE care and measuring MPE: rethinking patient relevance. These findings underscore the importance of greater consideration of pain management during MPE care, as well as improved communication and information prior to procedures.
conclusionPatients and carers found the TACTIC combined procedure tolerable and acceptable. Echoing the growing evidence of research in this field, authors emphasise the importance of outcome measure selection in MPE trials and suggest a need for a Core Outcome Set to establish fundamental priorities in MPE management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.