ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Lessons From Building a Large, Public HIV-Related Database in Support of the Ending the HIV Epidemic in the US Initiative.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The HIV epidemic remains a national priority in the United States, and the Ending the HIV Epidemic initiative has renewed the call for expanded prevention and treatment strategies capable of reducing new HIV infections by 90% by 2030. Achieving this goal requires robust, integrated data for understanding HIV-related needs, barriers to care, and the effectiveness of interventions. However, despite the existence of numerous publicly available datasets, few integrate multiple domains such as HIV outcomes, social determinants of health, and community-level factors. The lack of unified data and difficulty linking datasets hampers efforts for meaningful cross-domain analyses to tailor HIV management and treatment strategies. The resulting fragmentation constitutes a methodological gap: implementation teams lack replicable guidance for constructing unified HIV and contextual databases from public sources. In this viewpoint, we describe our experience building a unified compilation of publicly available HIV and community data to identify factors influencing HIV outcomes and interventions. The completed database comprises 242 variables drawn from 8 public sources mapped across clinic, zip code, county, and state levels of geography. Rather than simply reporting what we built, we position four core decisions as transferable methodological advances: (1) treating source identification as a bounded phase before construction begins, (2) adopting automated data engineering tools from the outset rather than manual entry, (3) establishing a shared data dictionary before the first variable is entered, and (4) integrating quality control throughout the workflow rather than as a final phase. The build required approximately 350 total project hours and revealed an initial spot-check error rate of approximately 33%, which we attribute primarily to manual data entry. By sharing the approach used to develop this database and making the final resource publicly accessible through the Yale Center for Methods in Implementation and Prevention Science, we aim to reduce barriers to data access and encourage similar data integration efforts. The methodological framework described in this paper is intentionally designed to be replicable with modest resources, and we present it as a practical model for research teams operating without specialized infrastructure. Consolidating HIV, social determinants of health, and contextual variables into a unified data source is a critical step toward enabling deeper, more comprehensive analysis and supporting ongoing efforts to end the HIV epidemic in the US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.