ArticleNano letters2026
Interfacial Water Structure Governs CO2 Electroreduction Selectivity on Copper via Surface Ligand Functionalization.
Article in Nano letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Controlling product selectivity in Cu-catalyzed electrochemical CO2 reduction remains challenging, as competing proton-coupled electron transfer pathways are governed by the balance between *CO coupling and protonation kinetics. Here, we demonstrate that this balance is precisely tuned by engineering interfacial water through surface ligand functionalization, without altering the Cu active site's electronic properties. Alkanethiols with distinct terminal groups (-CH3, -COOH, -OH) were anchored on Cu (Cu-UDT, Cu-MUA, Cu-MUO), imparting varying surface hydrophobicity. In situ attenuated total reflectance surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy (ATR-SEIRAS) reveals that Cu-MUA enforces a strongly hydrogen-bonded water network, whereas Cu-MUO promotes a predominantly free water environment, with minor perturbation of *CO in both cases. Time-resolved SEIRAS demonstrates that the divergent water structures dictate *CO decay kinetics in which Cu-MUA facilitates rapid *CO consumption via C-C coupling, yielding high ethylene selectivity, while Cu-MUO enables preferential *CO protonation to *CHO through enhanced proton supply, steering selectivity toward methane.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.