ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2026
The End of Silo Medicine: A Case for Disease-Centered Subspecialization.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern medical subspecialization was organized around organs, age groups and procedures during an era when diseases were viewed as isolated processes. Contemporary biology instead reveals illnesses that arise across systems and evolve across the life span. Yet clinical care remains fragmented among multiple specialties with no single physician accountable for the integrated whole. We propose disease-centred subspecialization, in which expertise for a complex condition is unified within a single clinical domain and supported by advanced clinical intelligence systems. Fetoneonatology, integrating foetal and neonatal medicine across the continuum of pregnancy and early life, illustrates this model. Similar integration is urgently needed for metabolic syndrome and ischaemic heart disease, conditions whose pathophysiology spans multiple organs and specialties. Evidence increasingly shows that fragmented care contributes to medical error, contradictory treatment plans, rehospitalization and poor long-term outcomes. We outline a framework for training, certification and AI augmented practice, organized around diseases rather than anatomy alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.