ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2026
Exploring Neural Mechanisms Underlying Error-related Impairments in Active Working Memory Suggests an Adaptive Shielding of Contents during Cognitive Control.
Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Goal-directed behavior relies on cognitive flexibility-the ability to rapidly adapt ongoing thoughts and behaviors while preserving task-relevant information. The performance monitoring system optimizes such behavior by detecting and evaluating errors, whereas the working memory (WM) system maintains relevant information and protects it from interference. We previously showed that motor errors impaired active WM maintenance (Error-Related Impairment of Active working Memory [ERIAM]; [Wessel, J. R., Jiang, J., & Stolley, J. J. Action errors impair active working memory maintenance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151, 1325-1340, 2022]). Here, we investigated the source of ERIAM by tracking the contralateral delay activity (CDA), a neural marker of visual WM maintenance, throughout the error-making process. Forty-two participants maintained visual information in WM while performing a flanker task during the delay period. Consistent with prior results, a significant ERIAM effect occurred. We observed the canonical CDA before flanker task onset, and this CDA declined after the flanker task began. Following the flanker response, however, we observed a sustained contralateral positivity (CDAp). Critically, CDA amplitudes did not differ between motor correct and error trials before the flanker task, ruling out a general performance deficit. The CDA was also unaffected immediately after flanker onset, ruling out a perceptual interference explanation. Neural differences emerged only after the flanker response, supporting a genuinely error-related origin of the ERIAM effect. Importantly, CDAp was larger following correct responses than errors, and greater CDAp modulation predicted a smaller ERIAM effect. On the basis of prior work, we interpret CDAp as reflecting disengagement from WM storage, suggesting a possible adaptive shielding strategy. These findings provide clear evidence regarding the timing of the ERIAM effect and suggestive evidence regarding potential mechanisms underlying error-related interference in active WM maintenance. Future work will help determine the functional significance of CDAp and its relationship to WM storage and cognitive control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.