Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42507757›Full record

ReviewCancer biology & therapy2026

Stress-specific 14-3-3-client modules in digestive cancers: an evidence-graded review of adaptive survival and therapy resistance.

Rudong Li, Zhipeng Zhao, Xudong Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer biology & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rudong LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Hernia Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0001-6478-8648
Zhipeng ZhaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Hernia Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0008-8957-3310
Xudong WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Nutrition and Hernia Surgery, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4184-6646

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

14-3-3 proteins are phosphoserine- and phosphothreonine-binding adaptors that regulate client localization, stability and activity under cellular stress. This narrative review synthesizes stress-specific 14-3-3-client modules in gastric, colorectal, pancreatic, hepatocellular and biliary cancers. Modules were classified as high, moderate, early/context-dependent or background according to mechanistic evidence, functional perturbation, client mapping, treatment-state validation and clinical association. In gastric cancer, G3BP stress granule assembly factor 1 (G3BP1) cooperates with YWHAZ-encoded 14-3-3ζ to retain pro-apoptotic Bax in the cytoplasm. In colorectal cancer, SFN-encoded 14-3-3σ restricts Yin Yang 1 (YY1), sustaining the unfolded protein response and chemotherapy tolerance. In pancreatic cancer, SFN-encoded 14-3-3σ interacts with Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) to promote ribonucleotide reductase expression and gemcitabine resistance. In hepatobiliary cancers, SFN-related modules support anoikis resistance but remain context dependent. Clinically relevant units are stress-specific 14-3-3-client complexes rather than total 14-3-3 expression.

Indexed as

14-3-3 ProteinsDigestive System NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmAnimalsHumansStress, Physiological14-3-3 Proteins14-3-3 proteinsanoikis resistanceautophagydigestive cancerstress granulestherapy resistanceunfolded protein responseYWHAZ

Identifiers

PMID42507757
PMCPMC13418467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.