Observational studyPloS one2026
Prevalence, risk factors, and management practices of premenstrual syndrome among female university students in Lebanon: An observational cross-sectional study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPremenstrual syndrome (PMS) is common among women of reproductive age and may impair quality of life, academic performance, and social functioning. In Lebanon, data on PMS and its management among female university students remain limited. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of PMS among female university students in Lebanon, identify risk factors, and recognize adopted management practices and their perceived effectiveness.
methodsAn observational cross-sectional study was conducted among female students at Beirut Arab University, Lebanon, between April 20 and May 8, 2026. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire assessing sociodemographic, menstrual, lifestyle, behavioral, psychosocial, and management-related factors. Premenstrual symptoms, social media addiction, and perceived stress were assessed using the Premenstrual Symptoms Screening Tool, Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, and Perceived Stress Scale-4, respectively. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with moderate-to-severe PMS and premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD).
resultsAmong 1,062 participants, 497 participants screened positive for moderate-to-severe PMS (46.8%), and 175 had symptoms consistent with PMDD based on the PSST (16.5%). The most frequently reported moderate-to-severe symptoms were physical symptoms (69.7%), fatigue or lack of energy (68.8%), depressed mood or hopelessness (67.8%), and overeating or food cravings (66.2%). Academic absenteeism was reported by 37.2%. More than one-third of the participants with moderate-to-severe PMS and PMDD (39%) reported using pharmacological management practices, mainly non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. However, less than half of medication users perceived these treatments as being very effective (45.8%). Higher odds of moderate-to-severe PMS were observed among current smokers (AOR = 1.61, P = 0.003), those with heavy menstrual bleeding (AOR = 1.58, P = 0.03), high meal skipping (AOR = 1.38, P = 0.03), high fast-food consumption (AOR = 1.34, P = 0.04), higher social media addiction scores (AOR = 1.31, P < 0.001), and higher perceived stress scores (AOR = 1.48, P < 0.001).
conclusionPMS was common among female university students in Lebanon and a considerable proportion experienced PMDD. In fact, lifestyle, behavioral, and psychosocial factors were associated with moderate-to-severe symptoms, highlighting the need for university-based awareness, screening, and counseling strategies that address modifiable risk factors and support appropriate management of premenstrual symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.