ArticlePloS one2026
Identifying cluster profiles based on barriers and facilitators to physical activity during COVID-19 confinement: A cross-sectional study using machine learning analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social restrictions, such as confinement periods, tend to reduce physical activity (PA) levels. However, sociodemographic factors may influence specific barriers and facilitators to PA during such periods. This study aimed to identify cluster profiles of individuals based on barriers and facilitators to physical activity (PA) during COVID-19 confinement. Brazilian adults participated in a cross-sectional online survey. The questionnaire collected demographic data, PA levels, sedentary behavior (SB), and perceived barriers and facilitators for PA. During data preprocessing, correlated barriers and facilitators related to a similar topic were aggregated. Using machine learning analysis, the K-modes evaluated by the Silhouette Score were used for barriers and the ROCK evaluated by the Silhouette Score was used for facilitators. The barriers model produced well-defined profiles, whereas the facilitators model did not. The facilitator model generated clusters with multiple negative silhouette coefficients and exhibited a significantly less cohesive cluster structure. Therefore, only the barriers-based model was used for further analysis. The best model generated eight clusters, each named according to the most frequent barriers in the group, such as "Inactive depressive women", "Active depressive women" and "Super active". The depressive clusters presented more barriers to PA, three barriers each one. Significant differences in PA and SB were observed across clusters. This work highlights the novelty of using unsupervised machine learning to uncover latent subgroups based on multiple concurrent barriers. In conclusion, tailored home-based and outdoor strategies should be developed, particularly targeting individuals with depressive symptoms and those facing significant time constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.