Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42507738›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Identifying cluster profiles based on barriers and facilitators to physical activity during COVID-19 confinement: A cross-sectional study using machine learning analysis.

Fernanda Castro Monteiro, Maria Luiza C Wuillaume, Carlos Linhares Veloso Filho, Karla Figueiredo, Felipe Barreto Schuch, Andrea Nunes de Carvalho, Thiago Sousa Matias, Henrique Nunes Pereira Oliva, Renato Sobral Monteiro-Junior, Lara Carneiro and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fernanda Castro MonteiroPsychiatry Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Maria Luiza C WuillaumeNational Institute of Technology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Carlos Linhares Veloso FilhoPsychiatry Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Karla FigueiredoRio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Felipe Barreto SchuchPsychiatry Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Andrea Nunes de CarvalhoNational Institute of Technology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Thiago Sousa MatiasFederal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Henrique Nunes Pereira OlivaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6452-9833
Renato Sobral Monteiro-JuniorPhysical Education Department, Montes Claros State University, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Lara CarneiroPhysical Education Department, College of Education, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4385-5290
Andrea Camaz DeslandesPsychiatry Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social restrictions, such as confinement periods, tend to reduce physical activity (PA) levels. However, sociodemographic factors may influence specific barriers and facilitators to PA during such periods. This study aimed to identify cluster profiles of individuals based on barriers and facilitators to physical activity (PA) during COVID-19 confinement. Brazilian adults participated in a cross-sectional online survey. The questionnaire collected demographic data, PA levels, sedentary behavior (SB), and perceived barriers and facilitators for PA. During data preprocessing, correlated barriers and facilitators related to a similar topic were aggregated. Using machine learning analysis, the K-modes evaluated by the Silhouette Score were used for barriers and the ROCK evaluated by the Silhouette Score was used for facilitators. The barriers model produced well-defined profiles, whereas the facilitators model did not. The facilitator model generated clusters with multiple negative silhouette coefficients and exhibited a significantly less cohesive cluster structure. Therefore, only the barriers-based model was used for further analysis. The best model generated eight clusters, each named according to the most frequent barriers in the group, such as "Inactive depressive women", "Active depressive women" and "Super active". The depressive clusters presented more barriers to PA, three barriers each one. Significant differences in PA and SB were observed across clusters. This work highlights the novelty of using unsupervised machine learning to uncover latent subgroups based on multiple concurrent barriers. In conclusion, tailored home-based and outdoor strategies should be developed, particularly targeting individuals with depressive symptoms and those facing significant time constraints.

Indexed as

COVID-19ExerciseMachine LearningAdultBrazilCluster AnalysisClustering AlgorithmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Sedentary BehaviorSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42507738
PMCPMC13405084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.