ArticlePloS one2026
Understanding the underuse: Barriers to vacuum-assisted birth among clinicians in Tanzania: An exploratory qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVacuum-assisted birth (VAB) is a critical obstetric intervention for saving the lives of the mothers and newborns, particularly in cases of prolonged second-stage labor, maternal exhaustion, or fetal distress. Despite its proven benefits, VAB remains underutilized, contributing to an increased rate of unnecessary cesarean sections, some of which could be avoided with timely vacuum extraction. This study aimed to explore the barriers to the use of VAB among clinicians at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn exploratory qualitative study using in-depth interviews (IDIs) was employed. Twelve clinicians with relevant experience in vacuum-assisted birth were recruited purposively into the study. A semi-structured IDI guide was used to facilitate the interviews. Data were analyzed inductively using thematic analysis to identify key patterns and categories related to barriers in the use of VAB.
resultsOrganizational and individual barriers were identified as key challenges to the use of VAB. Organizational barriers included insufficient availability of VAB equipment, ineffectiveness of the available devices, and poor team dynamics that hindered collaborative decision-making regarding VAB use. Individual barriers centered on clinicians' apprehension about potential adverse outcomes, along with limited skills and practical experience in performing VAB procedures.
conclusionThe utilization of VAB by clinicians is hindered by both organizational and individual barriers. Addressing these challenges through improved availability of functional equipment, enhanced training to build clinicians' skills, and improving working conditions has the potential to increase the use of VAB. Strengthening these areas could help reduce the rate of unnecessary caesarean deliveries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.