ArticlePloS one2026
Analysis of physical and physiological training demands in women's basketball.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe primary aim of the present study was to analyze the physical and physiological demands associated with different training tasks in women's basketball.
methodsFourteen basketball players were continuously monitored for 22 weeks using WIMU PRO®™ local positioning system and GARMIN® heart rate monitors. The variables examined included: distance (DIST in m), number of accelerations (>2 m·s-2, HACC) and decelerations (<-2 m·s-2, HDEC); high speed running (>18 km·h-1, HSR in m), number of jumps (JUMPS), player load (PL in arbitrary units) and heart rate zones (>80% of maximum heart rate, HRZ in seconds). Training tasks were classified into three orientations: directed-oriented (DIR, drills without opposition), special-oriented (SPE, small-sided games), and competitive-oriented (COM, 4-on-4 and 5-on-5 formats); and further grouped by three levels of court space. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to verify data normality. Linear mixed-effects models were used to analyze all variables. Skewed variables were log-transformed to meet model assumptions. Significance was set at p < 0.05.
resultsThe SPE tasks showed higher values than COM tasks (p < 0.001) in all variables except for HRZ. Also, SPE tasks reported greater values than DIR in the following variables: HRZ and HSR (both p < 0.001) and PL (p = 0.008). Finally, DIR tasks showed higher values than COM tasks in DIST, HACC, HDEC and JUMPS (all p < 0.001), whereas COM tasks exhibited higher values than DIR tasks in HRZ (p < 0.001). Considering the court space in which the tasks were performed, differences were found in all the variables analyzed, with larger spaces generally resulting in greater demands in most variables.
conclusionsThe results describe that task orientation and court space influence the load demands in women's basketball. DIR and SPE tasks elicited greater intensities than COM tasks, suggesting that training design should be strategically adapted according to the desired physical and physiological stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.