ArticlePloS one2026
Outcomes of proximal humeral chondroblastoma treated with intralesional curettage, electrocauterization of the cavity and bone grafting: A retrospective study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the 7-year outcomes of proximal humeral chondroblastoma treated with intralesional curettage, electrocauterization of the cavity and bone grafting in pediatric patients.
methodsA total of 17 patients diagnosed with proximal humeral chondroblastoma who underwent surgical treatment consisting of intralesional curettage, cavity electrocauterization, and bone grafting at our center between January 1, 2008, and January 1, 2018, were retrospectively enrolled. All patients received postoperative splint immobilization for four weeks and were followed up for a minimum of seven years. Tumor recurrence was evaluated based on clinical manifestations and radiographic X-ray examination. Clinical outcomes included functional performance assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick DASH) scale, as well as postoperative complications.
resultsIn total, 17 patients with proximal humeral chondroblastoma were enrolled in our study, including 10 males and 7 females, with a mean age of 10.9 ± 1.8 years old (range from 8 to 14 years). Among these 17 cases, there were 6 cases with lesions extending through the epiphyseal plate, and 11 cases with lesions located inside the epiphysis. During follow-up, 1 patient suffered reoperation due to tumor recurrence. Shortening of the affected upper limb occurred in 9 patients (52.9%), which was significantly associated with a young age(P = 0.012). The mean shortening was 1.2 ± 0.9 cm compared with the contralateral limb. The overall mean postoperative MSTS was 27.5 ± 1.4 points, with no significant difference between observed the limb shortening group (27.3 ± 1.4) and the non-shortening group (27.8 ± 1.4,P = 0.550). The overall Quick DASH score averaged 4.8 ± 3.9 (0-15.9), and no statistically significant difference was detected between the shortening group (5.3 ± 4.5) and the non-shortening group (4.3 ± 2.8; P = 0.452).
conclusionsIntralesional curettage, cavity electrocauterization and bone grafting is an optional treatment for children with proximal humeral chondroblastoma but still has a risk of recurrence. Shortening of the affected upper limb is a common complication, which is possibly associated with young age but has no impact on the final functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.