ArticlePloS one2026
An evaluation of a breastfeeding peer support service in North East England: A qualitative study with service users, practitioners and volunteers.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreastfeeding has health benefits for women and infants. Although the WHO recommends that infants are breastfed exclusively for the first six months, exclusive breastfeeding rates remain low in the UK, with many women stopping breastfeeding within six weeks of their infant's birth. Many women face challenges initiating and continuing breastfeeding, including low confidence, limited support and misinformation. Breastfeeding peer support (BPS) services play a vital role in supporting women to continue to breastfeed by connecting new mothers with trained volunteers who offer advice, emotional encouragement and reliable information.
methodsThis study aimed to undertake a formative evaluation of the BPS service in Newcastle upon Tyne from the perspective of those who deliver the services, the wider healthcare team and mothers' experiences of utilising the service. This evaluation used a qualitative design, consisting of one-to-one semi-structured interviews with practitioners, volunteers, healthcare professionals and service users. Recruitment took place between 28th March - 14th May 2025. Recorded interview data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Braun and Clarke's coding reliability thematic analysis.
resultsTwenty-two interviews were conducted (n = 11 practitioners, volunteers and healthcare professionals and n = 11 service users). Analysis identified four themes: mechanisms of the service; support offered by the service; outcomes of the service, and challenges to service delivery. Overall, the BPS was considered a supportive service by participants.
conclusionsThe normalisation of breastfeeding was seen as crucial to the service, while service users described that the emotional support provided helped to increase their confidence in breastfeeding. Challenges were identified for the service, including engaging those aged under 25 years and those for whom English is a second language. These findings will be used to inform the future development of the service.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.