Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42507633›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

A simulation model to predict the most efficient way to utilise operational resources when vaccinating badgers against bTB.

Richard Budgey, Megan Bird

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Richard BudgeyNational Wildlife Management Centre, WOAH Collaborating Centre in Risk Analysis and Modelling, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Sand Hutton, York, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9938-2584
Megan BirdNational Wildlife Management Centre, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Woodchester Park, Gloucestershire, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a disease carried by badgers that seriously impacts the health and productivity of cattle in the United Kingdom (UK). The UK government's aim is to be officially TB-free in cattle by 2038 in England and badger vaccination is one approach that can be used to achieve this. We use a simulation model to compare the relative performance of different vaccination strategies (treatment every year, every second year and every third year) under different field conditions and assumptions about vaccine efficacy. Population density, disease prevalence and duration of vaccine-induced immunity substantially affected the outcome of vaccination. A vaccine strategy with lower frequency treatment was effective and offers operational efficiency as multiple areas can be treated near concurrently by a single vaccination team, potentially halving the cost per unit area. The information presented here may be used to guide operational managers and decision makers towards a more efficient strategy in a particular area and may provide an estimation of the likely success of the chosen strategy.

Indexed as

MustelidaeTuberculosis, BovineTuberculosis VaccinesVaccinationAnimalsCattleComputer SimulationMycobacterium bovisUnited KingdomTuberculosis Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID42507633
PMCPMC13405079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.