Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42507496›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026

Noses on the wing: the olfactory capacity of hawkmoth wings.

Ahmed Reda Ismaieel, Regina Stieber, Bill S Hansson, Sonja Bisch-Knaden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmed Reda IsmaieelDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knoell-Straße 8, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1582-1920
Regina StieberDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knoell-Straße 8, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-3788-1602
Bill S HanssonDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knoell-Straße 8, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4811-1223
Sonja Bisch-KnadenDepartment of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knoell-Straße 8, 07745 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3424-8376

Funding

Max-Planck-GesellschaftMinistry of Higher Education and Scientific Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to their primary olfactory organs, the antennae, insects can smell using other parts of their bodies. In this study, we examined the olfactory capabilities of the wings of the tobacco hawkmoth, Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). Using scanning electron microscopy, we identified an average of 21-32 sensory bristles along the margins of each wing. In addition to raised sockets that indicate mechanosensory function, we observed a subapical pore and numerous wall pores. These pores are signs of chemosensory function, suggesting that the wings can detect chemicals upon contact or in gaseous form. Gene expression analysis revealed the presence of genes encoding chemosensory receptors, such as gustatory receptors (GRs) and ionotropic receptors (IRs), including IR76b, the co-receptor of amine-sensing IRs, and IR8a, the co-receptor of acid-sensing IRs. Genes encoding several odorant receptors (ORs) were also expressed in the wings; however, expression of the gene encoding ORCo, the obligatory OR co-receptor, was not detected. Electrophysiological recordings revealed that only the volatile amines pyrrolidine and piperidine elicited responses from the wings. Protein modeling and molecular docking simulations identified members of the Lepidoptera-specific IR7d clade as encoding candidate receptors for these compounds. These are characteristic alkaloids found in solanaceous plants, which tobacco hawkmoths prefer for laying eggs. Together, these findings demonstrate that the wings of M. sexta function as accessory olfactory organs that may influence oviposition choice.

Indexed as

ManducaSmellWings, AnimalAnimalsFemaleInsect ProteinsMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPhylogenyReceptors, OdorantInsect ProteinsReceptors, OdorantAminesChemosensory sensillaIonotropic receptorOlfactionSphingidaeWings

Identifiers

PMID42507496
PMCPMC13380975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.