Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42507334›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2026

Comparison of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and (chemo)radiotherapy in locoregionally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective cohort study.

Da-Wei Zhao, Shi-Rui Li, Fei Yang, Xiong-Fang Guo, Xiao-Zhe Sun, Ling Li, Su-Cheng Tan, Jin-Yang Qin, Ya-Jing Qu, Zhong-Qiu Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Da-Wei Zhao *Department of Oncology, Characteristic Medical Center of Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Tianjin, 300162, China.
Shi-Rui Li *Department of Radiology, Xinjiang Autonomous Regional Corps Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Urumqi, 830091, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Fei Yang *Department of Ultrasound, Characteristic Medical Center of Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Tianjin, 300162, China.
Xiong-Fang GuoDepartment of Oncology, Characteristic Medical Center of Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Tianjin, 300162, China.
Xiao-Zhe SunDepartment of Oncology, Characteristic Medical Center of Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Tianjin, 300162, China.
Ling LiDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Urumqi, 830063, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Su-Cheng TanDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Urumqi, 830063, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Jin-Yang QinDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps of the Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Urumqi, 830063, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Ya-Jing QuDepartment of Oncology, Characteristic Medical Center of Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Tianjin, 300162, China.
Zhong-Qiu WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Clinical ResearchCenter for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, No.1 West Huan-Hu Rd, Ti Yuan Bei, Tianjin, 300060, China. 15620900061@163.com.
Lin MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No.28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China. malinpharmpla@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8520-8449
Pei-Guo WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Clinical ResearchCenter for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, No.1 West Huan-Hu Rd, Ti Yuan Bei, Tianjin, 300060, China. wpg2017@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal strategy for laryngeal preservation in locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma (LAHPC) remains undefined. This prospective observational study compared long-term outcomes between two primary treatment approaches: induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC-CCRT) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (NAC-Sur-RT).

methodsFrom December 2018 to December 2023, 199 patients with LAHPC were prospectively enrolled and treated with either IC-CCRT (n = 124) or NAC-Sur-RT (n = 75). The primary endpoints were survival with functional larynx (SFL), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). Prognostic factors were identified using multivariable Cox regression.

resultsIn the matched cohort (median follow-up 49 months), NAC-Sur-RT was associated with significantly superior 5-year OS (58.3% vs 46.2%; adjusted HR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.38-0.95; P = 0.031) and DMFS (56.2% vs 41.6%; adjusted HR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.38-0.92; P = 0.023), and PFS (52.2% vs 37.2%; adjusted HR = 0.64; 95% CI 0.42-0.98; P = 0.040). Conversely, NAC-Sur-RT was associated with a significantly higher risk of SFL failure (27.0% vs 43.1%; adjusted HR = 2.18; 95% CI 1.45-3.27; P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in LFFS or LRFFS. Failure pattern analysis indicated more isolated local recurrences with IC-CCRT (15.3% vs 5.3%) but higher regional recurrence with NAC-Sur-RT (1.6% vs 6.7%). Multivariable analysis confirmed NAC-Sur-RT as an independent predictor of improved OS (HR = 0.60; P = 0.031), PFS (HR = 0.64; P = 0.040), and DMFS (HR = 0.59; P = 0.023), but also of worse SFL (HR = 2.18; P < 0.001). AJCC stage IVB disease independently predicted inferior OS (HR = 9.05; 95% CI 1.52-53.81; P = 0.015) and DMFS (HR = 8.49; 95% CI 1.53-47.23; P = 0.015). Additionally, NAC-Sur-RT was associated with significantly higher rates of severe (grade 3-4) toxicities, including laryngeal/esophageal, mucosal, hematologic, and functional adverse events.

conclusionIn this non-randomized prospective comparison, the NAC-Sur-RT strategy was associated with superior survival outcomes (OS, PFS, DMFS) but at the cost of increased severe toxicity and a significantly lower rate of functional larynx preservation. IC-CCRT offers a higher probability of survival with a functional larynx despite a higher risk of local recurrence. Treatment selection should be individualized, balancing survival benefits, functional outcomes, and toxicity profiles.

trial registrationThe study was approved by the ethics board of the Chinese PLA General Hospital and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registered number: ChiCTR2000039813).

Indexed as

Hypopharyngeal carcinomaLaryngeal function preservationRadiotherapySurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.