Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42507308›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2026

On z-shimming of non-linear and inhomogeneous through-slice field variations: insights from numerical simulations.

Jürgen Finsterbusch

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jürgen FinsterbuschDepartment of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. j.finsterbusch@uke.uni-hamburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6077-8119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveT2*-weighted acquisitions used for functional neuroimaging suffer from signal losses in the presence of field inhomogeneities due to through-slice dephasing that can be ameliorated with so-called z-shim gradient pulses in the slice direction. Determining the z-shim settings from the negative linear field component in the slice direction seems to be reasonable but the performance of this approach in the presence of non-linear field variations is unclear. MATERIALS AND

methodsHere, numerical simulations are performed for different through-slice field variations and echo times (TE) in order to determine the optimum z-shim setting that maximises the signal amplitude. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: They demonstrate that the optimum z-shim compensation gradient field, i.e. the gradient pulse time integral divided by TE, differs from the negative linear field component and depends on TE. The results also indicate that non-linear field inhomogeneities may cause a spatial weighting of the signal within the slice that is modulated with the z-shim. Furthermore, it is shown that these findings also hold for a region-of-interest composed of voxels with purely linear field variations that differ between voxels. Thus, deriving z-shim values from the linear field component(s) of a voxel or region-of-interest will, in general, not provide the maximum signal amplitude.

Indexed as

Field inhomogeneitiesfMRIT2* weightingThrough-slice dephasingZ-shim

Identifiers

PMID42507308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.