ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
A nonlinear windkessel model for cardiovascular dynamics: Variable compliance and pathological simulations.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lumped-parameter cardiovascular models are computationally efficient and physiologically interpretable, but many still represent arterial compliance as linear and pressure-independent. Here, we introduce a nonlinear extension of a classical closed-loop Windkessel model by defining aortic compliance as an exponential function of aortic pressure. The heart, systemic circulation, and pulmonary circulation are represented as an RLC network with time-varying ventricular elastances, yielding a twelve-state formulation derived from Kirchhoff's laws. Under nominal conditions, the nonlinear model recovers the linear baseline, with near-superimposable pressure and flow waveforms and physiologically plausible steady-state indices. Away from the nominal operating point, the pressure-dependent law selectively modulates proximal pulsatility, while mean arterial pressure, stroke volume, and cardiac output remain comparatively preserved. Targeted parameter changes produce qualitative waveform and index-level signatures consistent with aortic regurgitation and arterial stiffening. The proposed formulation provides a compact, physiologically grounded platform for sensitivity analysis, pathological emulation, and early-stage evaluation of cardiovascular modeling scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.