Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42507207›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Quantitative analysis of midline involvement for predicting contralateral cervical lymph node metastasis in supraglottic and glottic squamous cell carcinoma.

Hongyan Wu, Xinwei Chen, Wei Ma, Guohua Hu, Chuan Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hongyan WuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xinwei ChenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Wei MaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Guohua HuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Chuan LiuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. sallylk@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0642-3154

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo establish imaging-based quantitative indices for assessing midline involvement of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) and guide surgical management of contralateral cervical lymph nodes according to tumor subsite and ipsilateral lymph node status.

methodsRetrospective analysis of midline-involved LSCC patients was conducted. For supraglottic LSCC, the maximum angle between the non-ipsilateral tumor margin and the midline was quantified; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the optimal cutoff value for predicting contralateral cervical lymph node metastasis. For glottic LSCC, the non-ipsilateral tumor-anterior commissure/arytenoid cartilage-anterior commissure ratio (T-AC/A-AC ratio) was calculated.

resultsAmong 58 supraglottic LSCC patients, 16 (27.6%) developed contralateral metastasis (cN0 occult 3.2%, cN + 27.3%). The optimal angle cutoff as 33.4° (AUC = 0.809, 95% CI: 0.690-0.928). Among 146 glottic LSCC patients, 5 (3.4%) had contralateral metastasis (cN0 occult 1.6%, cN + 8.3%). The T-AC/A-AC ratio was higher in the metastasis group, though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.06).

conclusionFor midline-involved supraglottic LSCC, contralateral neck dissection (levels IIa and III) is recommended for cN0 patients with a margin-midline angle > 33.4°, while bilateral dissection is indicated for all cN+ patients. For midline-involved glottic LSCC, selective contralateral cervical dissection is mainly based on clinical evidence of contralateral metastasis. The quantitative imaging parameters (T-AC/A-AC ratio) require a larger sample size for validation.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellGlottisLaryngeal NeoplasmsLymph NodesAgedFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeckNeck DissectionNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesROC CurveLaryngeal squamous cell carcinomaLymph node metastasisMidline involvementPredictive value

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.