Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42507189›Full record

ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[EndoCert-Concept, development, and current challenges of a certification system in endoprosthetics].

Elena Trevisan, Holger Haas

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elena TrevisanEndoCert GmbH, Straße des 17. Juni 106-108, 10623, Berlin, Deutschland. e.trevisan@endocert.de.
Holger HaasZentrum für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Sportmedizin, Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus St. Elisabeth/St. Petrus/St. Johannes gGmbh, Bonn, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHip and knee arthroplasty rank among the most frequently performed elective procedures in Germany. Against a background of rising quality requirements and ongoing health policy reform, structured quality assurance in arthroplasty is gaining increasing importance.

objectiveTo describe the concept, development and current challenges of the EndoCert certification system in the context of scientific and health policy developments.

methodsNarrative review based on published peer-reviewed literature, the EndoCert system manual, annual reports, health policy documents (KHVVG, KHAG), and internal data analyses provided by EndoCert GmbH.

resultsEndoCert is the world's first certification system for arthroplasty centers, available nationwide since October 2012. It integrates structural, process, and outcome quality within a standardized annual audit procedure and has established itself as the leading quality assurance instrument in German-speaking arthroplasty care, with more than 500 certified institutions. Over 5800 audits identifying more than 4300 deviations demonstrate the practical effectiveness of the certification process. Since 2026, joint-specific certification levels allow institutions to align their certification precisely with their respective scope of care. The current hospital reform (KHVVG/KHAG) conceptually confirms the core principles of EndoCert. Key challenges include the further development of risk adjustment models and the broader use of patient-reported outcomes.

conclusionsEndoCert has established itself as an adaptive quality assurance system that integrates structural requirements, standardized processes and data-driven outcome monitoring within a single certification framework. The ongoing hospital reform offers the opportunity to establish the standards implemented by EndoCert since 2012 as mandatory nationwide requirements.

Indexed as

Audit procedureGerman Arthroplasty RegistryHealth care reformPatient reported outcome measuresQuality assuranceRisk adjustment

Identifiers

PMID42507189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.