ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Are early dislocations still a relevant quality indicator in primary total hip arthroplasty? : An analysis from two maximum-care endoprosthetic centers].
Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe dislocation rate of primary hip arthroplasty has been reduced since the 1970s to rates of 0.7-8.8%. Dislocations after primary arthroplasty are only recorded in arthroplasty registries when implant components are exchanged. In the EndoCert® certification process, dislocations in the early postoperative phase up to 3 months are additionally assessed without mandatory follow-up. Is early dislocation a significant quality indicator in primary hip arthroplasty? MATERIAL AND
methodsIn a joint database (EndoDok®), all dislocations after primary hip endoprostheses at two certified EndoProsthetics Centers of maximum care from various clinic providers were prospectively recorded over at least 3 months postoperatively using the available documents, including discharge, rehabilitation, outpatient, and physicians' reports. All patients who suffered a dislocation were analyzed in comparison to the control group without dislocation. Factors considered included gender, side, age, BMI, ASA, operation time, primary procedure, and prosthesis fixation.
resultsDuring the observation period of 9 years, elective primary total hip arthroplasty implantations were performed on a total of 3265 patients according to the same standards. The dislocation rate was low at 0.18% following elective hip arthroplasty. Risk factors such as increased BMI, prosthesis fixation, inclination angle, and operation duration were presented. The dislocation rate was not significantly influenced by training interventions. DISCUSSION: In the certification process, complications are consistently evaluated to improve processes. Under the quality-oriented conditions of the EndoCert® system, very low dislocation rates can be achieved in primary endoprosthetics. Even without follow-up examinations, consistent recording of dislocations allows for a comparable evaluation of provider quality and, in particular, provides the prerequisite for the mandatory complication analysis of all reported dislocations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42507188What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.